doc: add "Do I still need this dependency for my Node.js app?" to ambassadors program #57600
Conversation
|
Review requested:
|
|
|
| | [parsing arguments](https://nodejs.org/api/util.html#utilparseargsconfig) | [18.3.0](https://nodejs.org/en/blog/release/v18.3.0) | Stable as of 20.0.0 | | ||
| | [reading environment](https://nodejs.org/api/cli.html#--env-fileconfig) | [20.6.0](https://nodejs.org/en/blog/release/v20.6.0) | Active Development | | ||
| | [styling output](https://nodejs.org/docs/latest-v22.x/api/util.html#utilstyletextformat-text-options) | [20.12.0](https://nodejs.org/en/blog/release/v20.12.0) | Stable, as of [22.13.0](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/56329) | | ||
| | [run TypeScript](https://nodejs.org/api/cli.html#--experimental-strip-types) | [22.6.0](https://nodejs.org/en/blog/release/v22.6.0) | Active Development | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Npm run vs. Node --run can be added as well
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Agree that this is a useful addition, and did discuss it within https://noti.st/brianmuenzenmeyer/5ep4ZM/do-i-still-need-this-dependency-for-my-node-js-app - though I question whether most would describe their package manager as a dependency. Not trying to be pedantic.
The angle I took in the talk was that node --run does make documentation a bit more flexible, so that's an obvious plus.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
added via 2d049d4
Co-authored-by: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
bmuenzenmeyer
changed the title
|
presented today at Minnestar 19 in Minneapolis, MN Overhwelming feedback from the standing-room only crowd was that they wished there was an official list of this somewhere. https://noti.st/brianmuenzenmeyer/5ep4ZM/do-i-still-need-this-dependency-for-my-node-js-app |
|
@bmuenzenmeyer there are a few suggestions/comments on the PR. If you could address them we could get this landed. |
done - of course the TypeScript stuff especially is a moving target, with Node.js 23.6.0 unflagging strip typing, and transform types now available too. I suggest when this is taken up by an ambassador or more formally adopted, features on the newer side should be audited for similar relevancy. |
PR-URL: #57600 Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <[email protected]>
|
Landed as |
PR-URL: #57600 Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #57600 Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <[email protected]>
Also included is:
I chose to include all this together for review clarity and noise, but open to feedback of any kind. Cheers!
Understand most of this won't be acted upon until after collab summit, but I wanted to follow through here.